Treasury union asks for relief as IRS plans more layoffs

The National Treasury Employees Union, which represents workers at the Internal Revenue Service among 37 federal agencies and offices, has asked a federal judge for emergency relief to preserve the union rights of federal employees while NTEU's legal challenge to President Trump's executive order stripping unions of collective bargaining rights can be heard in court.

Earlier this week, after two court rulings in California and Maryland, the IRS's acting commissioner, Melanie Krause, announced the IRS would be bringing back approximately 7,000 probationary employees who had been fired and then put on paid administrative leave. However, on Friday, the IRS eliminated its Office of Civil Rights and Compliance, laying off approximately 130 employees, according to the Washington Post, while also making plans to eliminate around 20,000 employees, or almost a quarter of its workforce.

Trump signed an executive order last Thursday removing the requirements from employees at agencies including the Treasury Department that he deemed to have national security missions. On Monday, the NTEU filed a lawsuit to stop the move arguing that Trump's rationale for protecting national security was just a way to end union protections for federal workers. The administration also wants to prevent the unions from collecting dues automatically withheld from employee paychecks.

NTEU's request for a preliminary injunction was filed Friday with U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman.

 "NTEU seeks emergency relief to protect itself and the workers it represents from this unlawful attempt to eliminate collective bargaining for some two-thirds of the federal workforce," the request stated.

The NTEU contended that the Trump administration's executive order claims that allowing workers to join a union was a threat to national security were absurd.

"We all know this has nothing to do with national security and that the true goal here is to make it easier to fire federal employees across government," said NTEU national president Doreen Greenwald in a statement Friday. "Just five days after declaring the administration would no longer honor our contract with Health and Human Services, thousands of brilliant civil servants who work tirelessly to improve public health were let go for spurious reasons and little recourse to fight back."

The union pointed out that Congress declared 47 years ago that collective bargaining in the federal sector was in the public's interest by giving employees a voice in the workplace and allowing labor and management to work together. It acknowledged there is a narrow exemption in the law for groups of employees whose work directly impacts national security, but argued that Trump's executive order is blatant retaliation against federal sector unions and ignores the laws passed by Congress creating the agencies.

In agencies where a reduction-in-force has been announced, NTEU's contracts provide time for employees to respond to a RIF notice and explore alternatives to mitigate the impact of the layoffs.

The American Federation of Government Employees filed a separate lawsuit Friday over the executive order, in conjunction with the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, the National Association of Government Employees, the National Federation of Federal Employees, National Nurses United, and the Service Employees International Union, who collectively represent over 950,000 federal employees. 

A bipartisan bill has been introduced in Congress to preserve collective bargaining rights for federal employees. The Protect America's Workforce Act (H.R. 2550), sponsored by Rep. Jared Golden, D-Maine, and Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pennsylvania, would overturn Trump's executive order stripping collective bargaining rights from hundreds of thousands of federal workers at multiple agencies.  Separately, eight House Republicans and every House and Senate Democrat have sent letters to the White House condemning the executive order.